August 19, 2016

But because of the automotive ecosystem's tiered structure, system companies, IP and embedded software developers and tools vendors must invest more just to participate. Robert Bates, chief safety officer in Mentor Graphics' Embedded Systems Division, ...

>Read the source article at Semiconductor Engineering .

Related Resources:

Fault Injection or Requirements Based Testing in ISO 26262? - In this ISO 26262 focused webinar we will examine the following questions- How many fault injection tests are really necessary to ensure a safe application execution? Is requirement-based testing a better and safer way to ensure high quality software?  Is fault injection testing a subset of requirements based testing, and does it deliver the desirable outcome? We will look at which test conditions are necessary and explain why both Fault Injection Testing and Requirement-Based Testing are included separately in the ISO 26262.

Making a Stand - Rigorous stand-alone testing of the many physical components of automobiles is done as a standard part of the development process to allow manufacturers to work out the potential problems of a model before it goes into full production. After all, it is conventional wisdom that it's much less expensive to eliminate a problem before mass production begins than to discover a problem and have to fix it afterwards.


Posted under
Automotive Software News